Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Repost of my thoughts, to get the ball rolling ....
It's easy to see why critics might hate this one, since It doubles down on everything they hated about the last one. The chaotic editing, the media (and now social media) montaging, the freeze-framing, the onscreen text gags, the fourth wall breaking, the whole sensory overload of information, disinformation, culture, and pop culture. It nests satirical absurdities inside dramatic realism, and swerves from the terrifyingly poignant to the deliberately silly in minutes. Everything that grated about "Vice", if you happened to find "Vice" grating, is here ten fold in "Don't Look Up". McKay is a genre all his own, and he makes movies like they're YouTube videos, which actually makes them perfect for Netflix, and perfectly effective at parcelling out masses of information while keeping a coherent and engaging narratives driving along, but it's an approach that could not be better designed to annoy film critics, especially those looking for something like classic formalism, if that were its express purpose.
This approach though, allows the movie to function not just as satire, but as a unnervingly accurate, funny, but terrifying snapshot of right now. Anyone telling you however, that "Don't Look Up" hates us, or thinks us all idiots, is making it up. It's a movie that's frustrated by us, despairing of our lack of urgency, angry at how easily we attach to comforting lies over inconvenient truths. But, McKay is no misanthrope. Everything in the movie comes from a place of deep and heartfelt affection for us, for our world, and for humanity in all its farting, fucking, bumbling beauty. It's a movie that wants us desperately to save ourselves, and can't quite understand why we won't.
I found it very effective personally. I might even have shed a tear at one point.
As to Jennifer; yes, as has been long understood, her role doesn't give her a lot to sink her molars into. At least in terms of big meaty scenes. Save for a few brief outbursts of terror or frustration which she delivers with expected vigor. Jennifer though, has never needed great big speeches to deliver great performances. So much here plays out on her face, and McKay knows it. He cuts to it often enough, and even takes the time to linger on it at one point to poignant effect. She is the moral centre of the movie, and a living avatar of all the terror, frustration, and weariness we've all felt over the last few years, or longer. On one level it's a really clever deployment of her innate likability and relatability, even in a role that goes against what might be considered type, but Jennifer gives it more nuance and depth than that. Fuck, she's a good actor. I think I'd forgotten that. Not intellectually, but in my gut. I enjoyed watching her again.
Posts: 1,373
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 1,663 in 743 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: May 2019
12-12-2021, 12:24 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2021, 12:25 AM by lawrencepedia.)
Posting mine too:
+Editing was one of my favourite parts. I adored the way it was done. Never quite knew what you were gonna get and when.
+The score? Fabulous.
+I often feel like many movies just resemble each other in some way. Been there, done that. This one just felt fresh. Very very realistic obviously, but I can't really recall having seen a movie like it. I'm sure those are out there, but yeah, I personally haven't seen them.
+Jen, oh Jen. How I have missed you! For someone who supposedly doesn't get much to do, she certainly had the audience eating from the palm of her hand and was the one that got by far the most laughs. And often it wasn't even with saying much or anything at all. What others perhaps needed a whole scene to say, she could say or show in just a second. And this wasn't like any role she's had before. Which was also very nice to see. Was it a hard role for her? Hell no. But not all roles need to be difficult or challenging. And that running joke? A+
+Really enjoyed Rob Morgan in this as well. And Melanie Lynskey. Understated roles perhaps, but very much likeable.
+-The rest of the cast were a mix of both really. Loved Meryl, Jonah, even though he didn't have nearly as much to do as I thought. The end (not the end credit scene!) with him had me cracking up. Wanted more of him and Jen though. Timmy was nice too. Expected to not really like him and Jen together but they were quite sweet. There were a few people though where I had mixed feelings. Cate, Leo and Mark Rylance were all characters that I didn't care for at times and that I came around to, and the other way around.
+The dinner scene was really sweet and sad.
Again, it's messy. It's very Adam. And some, like myself, might love that. I personally wouldn't really change much about the movie. Maybe cut down a few scenes? Add some more Jen obviously, because Leo has quite a bit more screen time than her. But all in all? Fabulous. Don't really know why it's do divisive though. Because it's depressing how realistic it is? THAT IS THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT! haha
Also, the memes had the whole audience in stitches. haha As did the credit scene with Meryl.
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,899
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 1,436 in 650 posts
Likes Given: 446
Joined: Feb 2017
But he must know that we'll find out that the food is free, so why did he...?
1
Posts: 1,373
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 1,663 in 743 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,373
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 1,663 in 743 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: May 2019
1
Posts: 1,899
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 1,436 in 650 posts
Likes Given: 446
Joined: Feb 2017
12-12-2021, 01:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2021, 01:25 AM by sunworshipper.)
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 213
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 58 in 35 posts
Likes Given: 1,035
Joined: Feb 2017
12-13-2021, 03:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-13-2021, 03:30 AM by oladesuolusola.)
I just saw this. I really liked it! Jen was my favorite among the cast (and I mean this seriously) followed by Meryl, Rylance, Leo and Chalamet.
I really wish Chalamet does a movie with Jen in the future. What an affecting ending...and I found it to be less funny but more sad. I am a big fan of the editing here. This is a beautiful movie that I'm glad Jen is a part of it. I wasn't expecting Cate to have those scenes and I liked her as well.
Jen's character seemed the 'most human' or maybe realistic of them all in my opinion. Rylance was so creepy and deserves an Oscar nomination (alongside Jen). Meryl was the funniest imo. Jonah Hill's lines sometimes took me out of the movie.
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,899
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 1,436 in 650 posts
Likes Given: 446
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 194
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 69 in 53 posts
Likes Given: 5
Joined: May 2019
12-25-2021, 02:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2021, 03:03 AM by Eith007.)
Just watched this movie. I don't think it's as bad as some critics said, but I don't think this is a brilliant movie either. It's just mediocre. This movie doesn't work as a satire for me at all. It's too subtle and pulls too many punches. It didn't go all the way to exaggerate the situaiton. I would rather this movie really turn out to be more like a SNL sketch which would be more in line with the two post credit scenes. And during the last hour, this movie suddenly turns into a different movie, a serious political drama. The whistleblowers try to go against the evil government. They could have made Jen's character the central character from the beginning if they really wanted to go that route.
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,373
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 1,663 in 743 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 499
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 342 in 170 posts
Likes Given: 486
Joined: Feb 2017
Just saw this. I typically save my reviews for a second viewing. As a first impression I thought the movie was very good and the performances were terrific. It is certainly not subtle, but it is spot on the way Dr. Strangelove was as a biting social and political satire. Or maybe Network is a better comparison, with Leo even getting an "I'm mad as hell" TV moment. I think the satire was extremely effective because it is so spot on. I saw it less about climate change or any particular issue and more about the generally absurd moment we are living through, where something as elemental as a life ending comet gets bent and distorted by all the crushing forces we live with (24 hour news, news as entertainment, science as politics, politics as sport, intrusive social media, celebrity worship, tech billionaires seen as humanity saviors instead of as greedy, short-sighted, misanthropic businessmen looking to make money, etc). And just tne corrupting influence of trying to work within the system because the system is so broken that it corrupts everything it touches. Jen is the emotional heart of the film because she plays a normal person just trying to make sense of it all, and the film identifies with ordinary people who just want to know the truth and want things to be better while their leaders do not seem to care about them at all. The film places all of us in the middle just trying to make sense of things. I did not think the movie was in any way preachy because the film is centered on common people trying to make due in a crazy political and media environment. I suspect the critics did not like it because they were depicted as part of the problem. Like I said, spot on.
1
Posts: 2,383
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 1,290 in 591 posts
Likes Given: 1,447
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,899
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 1,436 in 650 posts
Likes Given: 446
Joined: Feb 2017
I thought that was probably what was going on because I couldn't figure out any other activity that fit. Although why on a rooftop? I was still unsure the second time I saw it.
Posts: 1,373
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 1,663 in 743 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: May 2019
1
|